This morning my sister and I were having a little chit –chat
over few things little later, I asked her something. She got little angry and
said
‘you have no right to say so’
Oyata ehema kianna ‘ithiyak’ neha
I was wondering she was ‘right’. Even as a sister there
is a limit that I can interfere in to her ways of working or doing things. She was
absolutely right. Again after few
minutes I just teased her again asking another question ‘as a sister what are the
rights I have over our bond?
Ok ok it is not about ‘rights’ I have used the wrong
word ‘the right word is ‘likes and dislikes’ – kemaththa saha nokemaththa’
This conversation and the words we used here are
tallying with what we discussed. The words we generally use depend on the
nature of the discussion or the things that we discuss. Likes and dislikes – these two matched with
the things we discussed.
‘Sister Rights’ - this comes under the category of
human rights I believe and I also believe that you may have not heard something
like ‘sister rights’. As such we can
think of many rights of categories. All are aware of their rights or the rights
of the others because people read and learn a lot these days on many things. That
is a good trend. According to my awareness it is not always the ‘law students’
who learn the ‘general laws of things now ‘others also read and learn something
though they do not sit for exams and become lawyers. That is also a good thing ‘
at least a little awareness on little, little things because the things that
you learn ‘never go in-vain’ ‘you will never have to throw without using them. One
day any moment you get a chance to use the things you have learnt.
All rights reserved’ – if you are a book reader than a
web reader you are very much familiar with this sentence that generally printed
on one of the front pages. This shows
that the ‘everything that is written there, the content is belong to someone
legally, the writers, the publishers etc. am I right?
Even I believe there should be some laws or rights over
using ‘this and that of web related things’. Correct me if I am wrong here.
Sometimes when we like to quote something from a book
or lines written in somewhere ‘we say or indicate the ‘rights of the particular
author writer etc.
Following lines were written in the MALALASEKERA
ENGLSIH SINHALA DICTIONRY before the page that shows the contents.
“ no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
in a retrieval system , or transmitted, in any from or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of the publisher’
The publisher has not given the authority to reproduce
etc without getting his permission.
If we quote few lines of a song we mentioned the name
of the singer at least ‘we automatically like to give the ‘right of the true
owner, to the owner of ‘certain belongings’.
Similarly we say if we take a picture, photograph to
describe something better or give it a complete meaning we do so, we never forget
to mention or give the right of the owner or the creator. Even if there are no
laws written there are ethics and ‘things related to humanity we should
respect.
When some group or people, company do any strikes then
we start talking and try to remind them about the ‘rights and the responsibilities’
related to the particular things they are discussing or the parties involved . Children have the right to learn, the
students have the right to learn. Yes there are rights ‘workers rights’ etc. the
rights of the owners of something private or public.
We have to use our rights respecting the ‘laws that are
generally attached to each and every task or role, company etc. you can fire a
worker if the particular worker has not fulfilled his/her duties or has broke
the laws of the company, the codes of conduct etc.
Some use the right they were given to ‘protest’. Often we
identify ‘some clashes between the rights and the responsibility over things.
If I am unable to ‘play my role as a good sister as the
general people/society has described the role, indicating the ‘ethics socially accepted.
I do not think that I have the right to
interfere or expect my sister or my brothers to play their roles as a brother
or as sister as society described or expect. I am thinking about the ‘smajagatha
neethireethi’ I am not thinking of the laws written in the books of laws but
the socially accepted laws written in the minds of people of a society, our
society.
I do not know whether there are any laws pertaining to ‘how
a sister should behave or interact with each other, the members of the family
or with siblings in the books of the laws.
When the teachers are on a strike the students say that
‘you are stealing our rights to learn’. I
have not heard anything before that the teachers say when the students are on
strike because of something ‘you are stealing the right we have to teach you’. Things are generally like that. When we are
asking for our rights ‘using our ways of showing it’ sometimes we are taking or
stealing away the ‘the rights of someone else’s’ may be.
How is it possible to win our rights pertaining to
certain role or job category with out harming the rights of others ‘is a good
think to think a while’.
There is always ‘human side of everything’.
Sometimes if you have to follow a certain law ‘there is
no space for emotional things or feelings. There is no space for ‘emotional
rights’ in the books of laws.
If you want to adopt a child you need to fulfill certain
things. If you have not filled the ‘what the law is asking from you ‘then even if
you ask saying that you really want to do so - adopt ‘you will not succeed’
because the law does not allow you.
We can say that ‘you have the right to hold the trophy
because you won it playing and showing your talents, skills against the other
group, team- ZIMBABWE.
You (the country) won may be because they lost the
balance of mind at that moment; we won because we defeat them. We won because
you showed your skills and talents. You won because you used your talents and
skills accurately, on time, right time.
For one group to win or become winners the other group
has to loose. And also you won because they have not done their home work properly
and they have not studied you well.
You won because they have not understood your capacities
of wining. You won may be because you are ‘more talented and have more skills
than they are. You won because they did not play ‘yesterday’s match properly
may be they might play next match well or they might identify their weaknesses and
try and find solutions for those things and become a winner. ‘Next time’. That is
the nature of winning.
We can think of many things regarding ‘rights and
responsibilities’ as well as ‘winning and loosing’.
We talk about these things ‘rights’ and
responsibilities because there is a big group called ‘people’ existing in this
world. ‘people’ is a one word yet plural.
No comments:
Post a Comment