Saturday, October 11, 2014
Games of Congresses of world politics
‘If the measurements of the hats (there are many hats to be sold in the markets, various) matches with the size of the head’ wear it’, if not ignore.
‘Life is a game’; this is like a mantra for me. I trust this to its maximum and fullest length. Once I wrote an essay under this title and posted on foot path. All other games, including the Olympics and common wealth and all other local or international games of this world are below the reality of ‘life is a game’
‘Life is a game’; so what is this life? Is it possible to analyze any other game outside to this boundary?
For some ‘politics is their life’. So when people breathe, inhale or exhale, drink or eat politics ‘there is no reason to white wash’, behind every plan of 99.99 % of parties there is some sort of games within. Let’s not use this terminology ‘harshly’ when talking of politics or games. How about using ‘strategies’, instead of the term ‘game’ when you analyze things of politics.
It is good if you alienate ‘sports- games’ from other games of the world we live. You know why? I do not like to give any negative marks or feeling about this term,’ games’ to ‘my essay readers’ who thinks games are an essential factor when think of ‘ health of humans .
And for some sports and games of sports (canoeing or yachting, cycling, driving as a sports activity, running including are something that they worship as sacred thing). So I do not want to devalue what they believe or their beliefs.
I do not want to feed in any facts to universalize my logic ‘life is a game’ in this essay because I have I guess discuss this earlier in a little lengthy way.
So I do not specifically want to devalue the term ‘games’ of sports.
I think in politics, some use the strategy of ‘family movers’ in their party activities. Have you guys ever heard about this before ‘the family movers’? They moves the families (don’t worry they just moves the goods, household goods’, when any family is deciding to shift to any place / residence of their choices’. it is rare that the families who has a permanent place to reside ‘moves from place to place’. I guess even if you think of the practical difficulties ‘no one would think of changing places from time to time’. Am I right?
Recently, I read an interview done with a parliament member ‘Buddhika Pathirana’ (UNP) which was published in ‘Irida Lankadeepa’, recently. So Mr. Buddhika reveled to the paper about his position about party members who constantly or regularly change their membership in a very strongest manner’. His reaction was not very heart soothing; I found some anger in his statements, shared with the paper. So after reading the interview, I thought, ‘why’, they have the right to do so’, if they don’t fitting, it is good to move out of the party and join any party they prefer. But one thing I am certain that any big party is pay very much attention to such members knowing their routings of politics. Am I right? That is what you called ‘democracy’, right? You have every right to vote who ever you prefer or like in what ever election.
But today, I thought little beyond to what I thought was right, mentioned above. Yes, it is true that ‘you have the democratic right to’ take any decision you like with regard to ‘anything’ not only about ‘membership of a party’.
Let’s take ‘membership of a party’ as an example. I believe it is not an easy task for an outsider to recognize a party that much, compared with the abilities of inner members of any party, with regard to ‘recognizing/ identifying inner pictures the inner members of a party, or party as a whole.
Forget voters for a moment, they measure things in a little different way when compared to MPs of a certain party, I guess. Hope I am right. ‘If you constantly changing your membership’, party positions, I wonder, how is it possible to understand ‘core of any party’. I believe that in anything that you do your ‘stability of thinking’ is highly important. Shaky breaky positions of mind always adds ‘not only some dullness to life but also ‘unsteadiness to your living style’. It is like a frog jumping here and there thinking of a proper place to make some sound or noise ‘ baka baka baka baka’
This theory is applicable to ‘policies of party members’. Playing games positioning in a certain party as a member is unethical.
Forget the members within a party who play certain games behind screens or hiding behind masks. What can you talk of members outside to certain party and the games that they play?
Perhaps ‘how you rate a certain party’, ally or a big communal, may depends on ‘what you expect from your party membership’, other than the positions gain as MPs after contesting or offered by party leaders under what so ever party policies - tag. If you expect something more other than what ever MP’ positions, you may get disappoint if you don’t get them, for instance, if you are expecting a sub leading position of a certain area (leading party organizer, or something) what if you don’t get it. What would happen to your dreams and desires of becoming or getting such positions? Again all depends on ‘your position in a party’, how rooted you are within as a member, the recognition you get this too we cannot ignore, how they respect you and you respect them, ‘the party decisions’ or policies’.
Above I was talking specifically about singular memberships’ but the same can be applied to the allies of any big party. This globe is full of various coalitions, allies other than apolitical there are huge number of political allies some act as members of major parties.
Sustainability of a certain ally, within a big party also depends on ‘what they expect’ from becoming or getting memberships, discussed earlier. ‘The duration that they any tiny/ small/ or big ally who may have joined a big party as a member depends on what they want or expect’. How ‘what they ask for’ or request’ affects the sustainability or functions, policies, winning situations of a major party is important to think and analyze.
So when frustrations are there (again, after measuring what a small ally request) a main ally can decide about ‘the position of the small ally joined with them’. If the major party think that it is harmful, what a small ally request from a main ally, how they act as a member hey can re think about such memberships. What benefits that the major party gets from such memberships such also important if you believe that ‘there are games in politics’. Also, things like, whether they act against party rules and regulations, policies or not, important to analyze.
Some change their positions based on ‘doubts’ in politics or of politics, positions. Such also leads to ‘change of party positions of some members’. There is a saying in Sinhala’ vaasi athata hoia . This is related to ‘fishing’, actually ‘hoia is a wording, sound that the fishermen make / use when fishing, using huge del / nets. If the fisherman knows which direction that he should lead, fix his fish net then they (mostly, there is a group of fishermen to support each other) somehow put the net in to that direction which gives them some benefit (fish - harvest). The subordinating group drag the net (hopefully with the harvest, a net full of fish) inwards from sea, that is from the area that they fixed the net saying ‘ hoia , hoia, hoia, hoia , hoia’. So exactly like the fishermen who fix their nets accordingly expecting some benefits / harvest from fishing, some members change their party memberships expecting more vaasi (benefits) than the benefits that a party normally offers.
don't cheer ( say hoia) any side just thinking of personal benefits think of the whole package thata country gets
I guess, steadiness in not only with regard to policies of a certain party also in ‘policies that one maintains as a member of parliament’ is highly important for a country. Don’t forget that the voters are not half sleep or sleep walking. They have their own measurements as observers of politics.
Every congress is important because it contains ‘people’s hopes’, or hope of certain group of politics. The size of a political group; do you think that these things are irrelevant? What percentage of representation it holds
What is the level of sustainability of an ally? What about their chances of winning ‘big positions’? Can a small ally survive alone, without really joining a main ally?
What is the main objective of an opposition party to your knowledge?
‘Winning’ that is the main objective of any opposition, defeating any current party that governs a country. Who does not understand this? They plan things accordingly, what and how they do things specific to each and every party, depending on their own positions in the field.
I personally have a feeling some worry about the positions and other benefits they get I say this because ‘what are the Sinhalese get that the Muslims or Tamils, bhurgers do not get in this country? If the train schedules changes doesn't it affect each and every human being that the service uses? ‘Who says that ha ha ha ha you are not allow only the other groups allow in’ pointing a certain or any group / individual?
If the prices of Gas goes up it affects not only the big also small. What happens if the prices decrease or become less expensive ‘who would benefit’, only the tall or small gets the benefits not the fat or thin?
It is true that when teachers’ salary increases the sole benefit goes to teachers and to students, to the entire field of education.
If a government builds a port / harbor or an airport is it only the ‘tall ones’, who use the facilities? Or is it only a specific group?
Entire country gets the benefit, income, service recognitions, and links with outside world
Who gets what, who has the power to decide? The sole decision maker is ‘the people of this country’ it is no good if you forget ‘the power of people’. You can play any game but we, the people will decide about your future in Politics.
Don’t think and act individually think what the whole country achieve as a NATION
May the triple gems, Allah, Jesus, Lord Ganesh! bless this country !