Wednesday, April 29, 2015
I believe that without trying to understand the ‘Pre - Socio, Economic, Political situations of the country that is before any leader/s were selected to lead the country, you cannot analyze any period of any ruler with regard to their Presidentships, ruling strategies or steps taken to develop or to solve socio, cultural, political and economic issues.
Here I refrain from discussing the situations before UNP ruling period for some of the practical reasons
But before that let me remind you all that I am a leaner not an expert so please keep that in your mind when reading this essay I wrote.
I like to divide recent past in to three segments for analyzing purposes
01)The Ruling Period of Madame CBK ( Chandrika Bandaranayake Kumaranathunge)
02) President Mahinda Rajapakse
03) President Maithreepala Sirisena
Let me take Madam CBK’s period first
According to my knowledge she was selected as the President, by the people of this country, voting against then ruling party, UNP (United National Party) that ruled this country for 17 years.
The significant political changes, struggles faced not only by the UNP Party but also by the people of the country in particular, during the ruling period of them ( UNP), I can categorize as follows, in order to not only to understand the challenges faced by Madame CBK , first and foremost and also to express my views with this regard to the topic chosen today to discuss.
During UNP Period, the situations or incidents faced by the People of the country , and by the part themselves, were as follows ( according to my level of understanding)
‘The JVP Movement’ arose against socio economical or political situation at that time
- Riots ( example ‘83 July)
- Some Workers Strikes
- The LTTE situation began back beginning of 1976(?) , slowly and slowly
According to my view I can say that do not forget that some took the advantage of the difficult situations, struggling situation, uncertain situations of the country, from time to time, that is a different matter to be discussed or analyzed , considering the situations of past, history.
Even now, what you need to be careful of is ‘the people with ill willed minds. Do not let such or keep any space to take advantage or make use of any unstable or no unity situations even for a shorter period of time.
So those mentioned above, were some of the challenges faced by the Former President CBK.
People expected solutions for the issues that were not solved during UNP period.
If you memorize the list of promises that were kept before the people before the Presidential Election , that was by Madame CBK, ( Rea read if possible), such I can say were the things that were missing or were not solved during the period of UNP
I am not an expert therefore I can only ask questions from the experts, that know the subject that I discuss here, while expressing my personal ideas of the topic, rather fully trying to write what I feel personally of the changes occurred in the Political side, admin system or of the rights or wrongs of the implemented , established
What were the reasons for such, mentioned situations to arise? This student believes that answer can be framed or structured under following categories or segments; socio, economic, cultural and political situations
This student likes to share her views as well
According to my personal view, if you find no unity among various ethnic groups, between each and every ethnic group and if they misread each other, suspect each other (for what ever reasons), you cannot find unity in any of the communities you can think of.
Or else one can say that ‘there may be actual reasons for them to behave ‘mistrusting, disbelieving each other’. The Economists, Sociologists, Politicians and the other experts can think of the reasons
If by any chance, in any of the society or in any of the community arises, whom should they trust in solutions, who are the people that should handle such situations, effectively and accurately?
Is it the ‘People of the country’ in particular or ‘The Heads of State’ (government)
Who should take the responsibility of such situations?
Is it the people who live near sooriya kanda or in Pamankada?
I do not know. That is why I am asking this question from you.
Also please take 83 riots for example, analyze the situations , the reasons
All what I am trying to convince here, before we pointing finger at any Leader for not changing the Admin System – old, or for unmet targets or the constitutions that have been practicing since 78 or any of the existing Constitutions that were in practice even before, we should take some time off from our traditional ways of thinking or thinking habits, without really sticking, limiting our thinking in ‘narrow minded view points’, before, totally praising or criticizing any of the existed parties , governments for not taking actions to do so.
And think of the LTTE situation at that time before she was selected as head of Country.
How old was the issue back then?
Can you calculate?
She was handed over the big Chair, with LTTE issue, unsolved
Within the content of her list of strategies, She tried various ‘Negotiations’ (Refer Negotiating Peace in Sri Lanka)
With regard to that this Student refrain from asking question all the time but likes to say that she was cheated by some of the ‘Peace Talkers’, Mediators (my personal view) that she trusted
And the LTTE often broke the rules or promises during the ‘cessations’
Am I right the experts?
Some of the groups, The Mediators (Peace) that she selected or her government selected (some of them) , contributed to strengthen the situation by giving financial Aids (as well as ‘ Weaponry support?) and some countries kept space for them to grow financially, so it was difficult to defeat them , by using that strategy that you all very well aware, called ‘Peace Talks .
But what LTTE did was providing a different picture of the parties involved as peace talkers
So during Peace Talks, they became fatter, in their activities and expanded their net work all over the world.
So considering all such facts we can say she failed to achieve Peace in a sustainable manner, eliminating the LTTE fear totally.
But compared to earlier situations People were happy of the other socio, economic, political situations of the country to a certain extent, I can say.
I think during her period or little before the JVPiers decided to contest for the parliament without going in to any armed strategies. Am I right?
In what year they decided to contest for the parliament for the first time?
I believe that she leaded the country, with a good assisting Minister, Including the Prime Minister at that time.
She too didn’t think of changing the ‘Existed Constitution’
Were there any suggestions or requests from the sides of the People or to abolish it, back then?
Yes, to some extent, I guess?
I am not going in to say anything any further or trying to analyze it very deeper here about her period of ruling
I guess what I pointed out is fairly enough to understand what I m trying to say here
Then, after her ruling period The Former President MR (Mahinda Rajapakse) was selected very respectfully by the people of this country as the President of the country, after Madame CBK
How old was the LTTE issue back then (2005)?
How widened the net work?
How strong they were?, Needless to say.
The Chair and the responsibilities of LTTE, unsolved were handed over to the hands of the President MR in 2005
Other than some of the socio economic , and political expectations of the people of the country back then, what people expected from the President MR was to solve and defeat ‘the LTTE fully and totally ’ and bring sustainable ‘peace and harmony’
It was a challenge, do you agree, People?
So during that time, the LTTE was getting massive support world wide, they became fatter not only financially but also in other ways.
He, using the previous lessons learned by the leaders – ex, changed his strategy of facing the LTTE issue in order to solve it fully and totally.
He knew what to do, when to do in order to solve the issue.
Who is disagreeing to what I am saying here?
He used his executive Power when he had to decide ‘whether to continue with the same strategy used by the ex leaders (Peace Talks for example) or else whether to move on to ‘humanitarian War’ until defeating and solving the problem
He as a leader gave fullest liberty for each and every party involved as members of Armed forces or as Civil Supporters
He took the decision to continue to use his Forces ( at that time apart from the Leaders of armed Forces, was he the chief of the ministry of Defense as well? (if I am not mistaken)
All I know is he as a leader of the country, didn’t interfere with the things of the battle fronts and provide all what they needed, weaponry including
His Government, his group, All Forces, Civilians succeeded in that effort of winning the war against terror, do not forget that was under his LEAEDERSHIP
Without trying to be cruel, give him the credit for what he did.
He fulfilled the Desires or expectations of the people of the country, with regard to ‘bringing sustainable Peace in to this country by defeating the LTTE
Yet, still there were challenges and threats that were faced by the Government (SLFP), that were the external threats such as ‘Diaspora, The LTTE supporters as well as the Political enemies of MR
Every Group that was supporting the LTTE became an enemy of MR and his government.
His pictures were burnt by the LTTE supporters in some parts of the globe. Yes, some supported MR world wide we should acknowledge and appreciate every single person supported
Yes, according to some ‘The Issue was solved internally but not internationally or globally. Some of the big chairs of the big organizations, I fear not to tell, supported such net works existed directly and indirectly and in public.
Most expected MR to leave the position and go home.
And at the same time, some groups tried their best to remove the banned label from the list of terror groups considered as threat to world peace situations
I believe the LTTE also got the support from the groups that had similar aim or an objective like the LTTE
They tried various tack ticks to remove the label , like mentioned earlier as well as some challenged the Peace we won after 30 + years of suffering period lived in fear, facing unstable socio economic situations arose due to terror activities of LTTE.
Now the country is peaceful (2009) and then the SLFP government started the next phase, ‘Development activities, High ways for example, various development plans.
I think about 90% of the issues of roads of the country are solved.
Though this is a tiny country, I do not think that the Government received 100% support from every provincial leader to full fill the objectives of building roads for example, internally. But, Yes Compared to past what they initiated and implemented was a massive achievement.
I guess , he didn’t received support from some of the leaders of the world due to their admin or dreams with regard to governance or political desires when implementing certain projects such as Chinese contracted ‘Trade island’
Earlier it was appeared as ‘any environmental issues but something politically or regionally significant
So every supporter of LTTE is even today (2015)still thinks that MR is a tyrant. Understandable
I say, if there are any disputes or issues faced in handling things, it is so dear to accept them but not for the things undone. You need to explain everything to the people of the country, specially because I can say and see that some of the things are totally a POLITICAL DRAMA
Or else Please clear everything and let people understand you’ erasing misunderstandings in their minds. Prove them what ever necessary.
Alright, President MR didn’t change the constitution like some expected.
Until President MR decided to go for an election, considering what so ever situations everything was peaceful.
The Ministers were with him, engaged in their duties. NO signs of them moving out or stepping out from the Party, happily enjoying all VIP facilities.
Am I wrong?
Then the President MR was good otherwise they should have thought of moving out of the party no?
Alright what happened next?
After choosing Ex Health Minister as Presidential Candidate by who ever, The Battle began.
Though the President himself earned 58 lakhs of votes individually ( the majority of the MP’s supported the SWORN candidate), Candidate Maithripala Sirisena became the Next ( current)Executive President of the country.
He was handed over a country with NO TERROR Fear and with massive percentage of roads developed along with some of the implemented projects.
He does not have to worry, do not have to think sleeplessly of the things that other ex leaders had to think or worry , such as ‘how to solve the LTTE fear or terror
Am I wrong?
Therefore, He can totally and fully engaged in changing the constitution’ with a peace of mind, a mind free from any fear of any terror attacks during sleep or when conducting a meeting in the parliament.
I can see that his strategies are different to both Madame CBK and President Rajapakse.
No point to trying to read them physically or from facial expressions, that is very idiotic.
Alright, Now the 19 A is in progress
Congratulations!!!!!! let me congratulate the President for handling the situations using his power so smoothly
And then the challenge is ‘how these Commissions acts before people keeping their personal agendas at home before coming in to the commissions offices
They should be highly MONITORED; otherwise people may get in to other issues.
Please make sure you do not keep any space for such situations to arise
So I believe ‘Without really trying to understand socio, economic, political and cultural situations of the periods of various leaders, you cannot provide a total picture of any socio, economic, political situations and keep them before the public.
This note is to be continued ……………………
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
'Thoughts' are not always milky white or off white or pure white. Some thoughts are colourless. Some thoughts are coloured with something picked or chosen from somewhere or elsewhere. You cannot predict about thoughts. i find no white adults and i have not met any white adults all these years of my living. 'White' has various and different meaning , i am sure you all know that very well. i am not talking about the 'whites' of the west or the blacks in the East. You may find white in black. The black in white. you get rangers of colours. you see them in fabric, thread or in what others talk or discuss.
i feel infants are pure white though they embrace various colours when they gradually become children, teen, youth, adults.
i do not know whether i should talk about colours today or about the white ( colour) in particular or else whether i should talk about MILK specifically.
Perhaps about 'cattle farming' then milk becomes a definite topic, automatically
i think in any agricultural community 'cattle farming' earns or has a very special , important place.
i know that agricultural farmer is different to other farmers, if you think of the categories. fisheries is something totally different from cattle farming or other agricultural activities. i am specifically thinking of 'prawn farming' that brings the farmer a good money. specific topic to discuss yet such thoughts are very coastal not very inland or highland. lets talk about coastal thoughts or about inland fisheries / activities on some other day.
i think, now you can talk about 'technological feeds' with regard to cattle farming rather than talking about 'traditional feeds. i do not know whether i should begin this essay methodically without really straight away talking about feeds for cattle
we know that cattle farming is as old as paddy cultivation. for agricultural activities such as 'land preparation activities, very before machinery revolutions begun, we used animals to complete various activities related to agriculture
People always like to do various or every possible experiment they can think of or testable in what ever they do. without knowing the subject i cannot say anything perfectly here, but something from what i heard or learned from farmers.
I am thinking of the 'traditional methods of agricultural farming' and the technologically improved farming strategies.
i know that it is good to talk about benefits and harmful things of both technological strategies or traditional methods with regard to the 'fertile - sustainability' of the lands and the 'quality of harvest', weight of harvest (total)
from seeds to harvest its a huge process and there are a lot that can be discussed. if i begin to talk about that my thoughts may become very 'grainy' so lets mute this discussion for few days until i collect some information about methods of farming / irrigated agriculture
we all know though we can think of similarities the nature of two farming shows differences as well.
The space ( the land), the capital, time investment, wage or family labour, waiting period until they get harvest.
what you earn from cattle farming is 'quicker', daily or monthly, something fixed (?) and not seasonal.
i didn't know that there is something called 'cattle feeds' other than 'punnakku' but i know about fertilizer and about pesticides also weedicides. knowledge is something very rocketry , you should stay in touch with every day updated knowledge otherwise what would happen is ' you become cageous or primitive. The world is faster than we can imagine. But we should only pick or choose what is relevant or useful, good for our living or earnings, people.
it is advisable that we should not stagnant in 'traditional methods of farming, very including in 'cattle farming' yet carefulness brings good results, if you think of the harvest, milk or otherwise
The total number of bushels they get from an acre or from a hectare depends on how you take care of your fields. From the traditional methods of cultivation of yester years to very technological methods of today, you can experience some difference' with regard to investments and harvest also profit earn.
i do not know whether what i heard is memorizable right now. In this season, the harvest they have gained from a hectare (?) is about 1.3 metric tons of paddy. I am not sure whether i can remember the right figures. i tried to memorize this figures / facts in numbers, from the time that i hear the news ,when traveling from Kandy to Kurunegala, couple of days after the New Year.
i believe that the Government have introduced 'fertilizer package' for a reasonable bearable price few years back (after 2005) for the Paddy Cultivators yet i guess there is no such programme introduced for the 'cattle farmers' , something lacking there.
So i like to suggest, if you think of 'all farmer's improvement' try to implement something for them as well.
Here are some facts i gathered , observed.
The Market Price for 'cattle feed of a particular trade name' ; each packet (25kg packet) is about 985/= (selling price, retail price). i am not sure about the whole sale price.
i do not know whether they can buy them in kilos, if they do not want an entire packet or if they cannot afford for a huge pack. i think number of packets or number of kilos they need depends on the number of cattle the farmer owns.
i do not know whether they should continue feeding with such feeds once they begin to give them. i do not know whether it is harmful if they suddenly stop giving them such feeds and continue with the old or traditional methods of feeding the cattle.
so for a big cattle farmer, the total number of rupees they should invest / spend a month for what ever necessary depends on such calculations as well. i think that the veterinary consultations/ advises, they get for free of charge but i am not aware whether they consult them private doctors / advisers as well.
i know that they need to invest some money initially to begin such employment activities to earn a living, a better profit. ( The capital)
For the Hut / shelter for cattle they need to invest some money, for the cattle ( depends on the kind /variety) for some types of cattle they have to pay 100, 000 rupees . for hygienic feed it is essential to have a better equipments and tools as well, such as feeding and milking buckets, containers with air tied lid to avoid bacterial issues.
Better refrigerating . storage facilities are also important
Most farmers use family labour, rarely wage labour ( depending on the size of the farm) no high labour costs compared to paddy cultivation
collecting and selling centers at village level is a significant feature of 'profit earning' of cattle farming
You find certain Milk collecting centers at village level that some small, medium or huge cattle farm owners have started.
some of the popular big companies come to village to collect 'milk' from the farmers and small farmers bring their harvest to these little or other collecting centers.
i think that there are government milk collecting centers part from these privately maintained centers that deals with private companies. I have no idea whether the two institutions pay them differently or the prices similar.
1 Liters of milk = Price?
i think when farmers does both paddy cultivation and cattle farming they can benefit from each activities, i.e. wastes such as cow dung, piduru can be used various ways as relevantly or appropriately.
Cow dung can be used for paddy cultivation, to improve the soil fertility, during mute period of paddy cultivation , until next season begins, brings good results.
Piduru can be used use as cattle feed ( traditional)
some grow Grass types suits for cattle,i know, but, some do not invest labour , or take no effort to grow such specifically but uses what they get from their own home garden.
so these two types of activities are mutually and cordially benefit from each other.
so i think though they need to invest more time or labour( daily) for cattle farming, compared to any other type of seasonal cultivation such as paddy, vegetable or chena cultivation its an independent fairly profitable , reasonable investment, earn a living
so i guess more government intervention is necessary and what ever began should continue without any hazard. New programmes if neccasry should begin appropriately to look after the cattle farmer.
i know compared to past the standards and the levels of improvements of the cattle farmer is satisfactory. i.e Prices
wish you all a milk white future
Monday, April 20, 2015
I am thinking of the diplomats, I am thinking of various carrier personalities, I am thinking of various professionals, their awareness on their duties, responsibilities, rights etc because of socio political situation of the country - current.
People have things to say these days, about constitutions of various numbers and years. People compare things of past and present. People compare the situations with incidents. Some challenge some. Some hold or exchange various things about people’s personal opinions, public opinions of individual compiled the 19A, about its content, about sub sentences, or sub lines or people’s rights of holding ‘views – independent’ on various facts or incidents of here and around globe.
About the 19A; people hold various opinions or perceptions and they show their views against or support. You cannot say ‘people have no right to show their personal views on that or say things of their responses with a negative attitude or face-cut, mood.
They can show their views various accepted ways, take small protests for examples. Through what others say, according to the ways they show their views, strategies used to say things ‘ you can have an idea of what others say’, what others believe.
Before releasing any statement on anything, one should think of his/ her position, what right they are given by the positions they hold (carrier), ‘for example, if we say ‘somehow we are going to get the support’, somehow we are going to publish it’.
Sometimes we have positions that once the job given is over, they have no right to the work assigned. But like everyone else they have the right to hold their personal views. You need to careful when you are using terms or words such as ‘we’, ‘us’, their, ours etc. specially when you are acting or talking or representing an institution, group, party. I am a person that has no affiliation to any institution, or party I hold my personal views on current or past things here or there, and I am not representing anyone either.
Today, I heard that the Former President Mahinda Rajapakse was asked to appear before the bribery Commission , according to the news ‘that is because of the decision he was taken before election to appoint ‘ Ex- UNP Party secretary, as ‘ Minister, health affairs, when the ex health minister, the current President left the government to contest as ‘presidential candidate
The idea of writing this essay is not to talk about any law points or facts, especially because I am not a lawyer but a woman who has some knowledge, I believe, about general things of the society on this and that. I like to try to use my common sense here, fully.
According to my personal beliefs, views ‘ I say it is not good to keep any position ‘blank’, empty or vacant even for a tiny period of time, specially when the vacant position and its duties considered as highly important for related people, department, nation or country, though the deputies or the sub monitors can handle some part of the assigned duties of any position relevant or applicable, important.
I think I shouldn’t talk much about the decisions taken by ex ministers of ex government to ‘jump and go’ ( ysgmq lKavdhug fydfrka mek, hkav) and join the other group , planning everything secretly, without releasing or handing over any prior notices to the captains, leaders, or the person in charge of party activities. I do not know how the law has guarded their decision of leaving the ex government thinking of joining the ‘sworn candidate then, to support his /their project activities.
According to what I read or heard’ the set of laws written in order to support the decisions of any party member who wish to leave their parties, from its membership was compiled by or the sentences were added during the period of ex chief of justices (?) Mr. Sarath N Silva. I do not know whether there is any sentences added to remind the members that they should inform who ever leading or heading the party of their resignations before or within what so ever period of time.
Though you find no sentences as such ‘people can use their common senses or ethical values’. i do not like to say same thing again and again because I have discussed this matter or what ever happened in the past with regard to political change of the country many times. Yet, I often feel that it is good to remind or freshen my mind on that or take examples from past to verify or clarify what I say.
If the commission say, according to what so ever law that the Former President has broke any mandate of any thing, they need to think back on certain things happened before the presidential election.
I feel that the bribery commission should know or aware of the groups, who ever was handling the ‘project ( all know) activities’ , forget what ever law point you know, but do not forget how they formed the government – current. How they picked and chose ‘members to form the government – current. What law or ethics they followed or respected to do so. How saintful they are then. How they Bribed the ex ministers of the former government not quantitatively but mentally ( You can say NO)
How did those ex ministers who left the party, to join the sworn group? How yahapath (hym;a) were they?
I feel, if you are talking about bribes they were the first to do so.
bribing (personally i like to weigh it this way) or keeping ‘ certain positions before the persons who wish to join the former ‘presidential candidates hunting Project’ as ‘presidential candidate’, after agreeing to certain things ( I have not read their agreements- popular or the agreements not published, the agreements - oral) , for examples such too I guess were sort of bribing (change the law if its not written).
‘the chance given or shown to who ever wished to contest as presidential candidate’, I say also was something similar to bribing. What can you say about such things. I do not know who involved though.
Are these my arguments looks ‘odd’ or looks like something like a joke’, probably. I do not about the law, the laws sometimes you can change as you please, if you know the facts points or to support ‘any nation’, any community, any people of any country, I as a citizen of this motherland feel that as the President of the country, then , as the President of the country who was not handling by any outside or internal thread , the decision taken by President MR , to fill the vacancy of the ‘ minister of health ’that was vacant, was a good decision, specially, considering the situation at that time.
Because according to my personal view, the people of the country became little ‘uncertain, furious’ or little disturbed after the incident happened in the political spheres, The decision of ex Minister, health affairs to join the other political party (?), group that was newly formed, without really informing the ex party leadership about his decision to join the project group.
So to calm and quite the Nation of the country after such incident, any leader, lawfully or socially should take action to avoid any socially disturbed situations, any confusion within the communities. Because people’s waves are stronger or sometimes unpredictable , if you know bit of political history of past.
I do not know whether you can say such are called ‘psychological bribing’ ( udkisl w,a,ia) or something, I do not know the exact term for that? Such things cannot be easily measured , right?
How is it possible for the law to catch such? People can analyze such activities that way as well, right?
I am not against the President Sirisena, because I respect the VOTE of the People in its fullest ‘respect’ and meaning. I guess at least the President knew about the decision taken by the Bribery commission to take The Ex President before the commission. if he says that he doesn’t aware of it, I as a citizen of this mother land say, its silly and not worth of handling such a huge position.
Awareness of something is not equal to ‘interfering’. As a President, independent, no other external thread of handling his work, duties, when the citizen or any external member of any group inquire him about what ever reasonable, what ever activities that people have right to ask, he cannot say’ I am not aware of it’. Awareness of activities of any tiny weeny dept.or centre of government is highly essential and that is what people expect from any top leaders.
According to some idiots they say, example, if any school boy shown any skills or won any trophies under the leadership of any principle of any school, he can claim his ‘ credits’ dignity via such achievements. Also they say that such people, individuals are part of winning group or achievers but for a President like MR, when it comes to other significant activities such as ‘wining a humanitarian war’ in Sri Lanka for example, leading a country’ aiming at eradicating terror fear, giving all ‘forces liberty, without any interferences to handle ‘battle activities’ giving necessary guidance, liberty, government support, providing all relevant , necessary weaponry, equipments, tools and mental support cannot say that he was a massive part of winning the freedom, the liberty against terror’. But such idiots categorize such things as something sin’. It is truly sad to hear that how some, so called educated say things so idiotically.
If you are a leader, dear sirs and madams , I say ‘you cannot say you are unaware of any current activities’, or decision taken by any group, that is existing under your supervision, if you are not aware of activities or decision taken by relevant or authoritative groups or individual responsible, then it’s a matter of ‘wrong / inaccurate governing methodologies. Should be corrected immediatly.
Then, I suggest please change such systems, first and foremost. We wish to have a leader who is very well aware of every single thing happening around the country, in the departments, in the ministries, near ministers or dear ministers.
I have seen some leaders fallen sleep when others in the parliament behave like kids throwing papers here and there but it is different when the same holding some responsible position. Remember ?
The leaders should be awaken all time, all moment not fallen sleep. The leaders should be firm and strong.
The vows it self or wishes of handful or few won’t protect or save your positions, it is the likes or dislikes of entire or at least majority ( I am not referring this term to describe any ethnic group), in one word it is the ‘vote’.
According to current handling, protection given by the law or as described in the book
of laws or what ever term you use ‘ the president cannot take decision to appoint any top positions using his executive power, because the president will not be the executive president any more unless it is written or described in the constitution.
So next time no person can come to any position if the majority of people disagree. I do not know whether I am right here. Do not forget that I am using my common sense here, not the law points.
So finally, the current government, the bribery commission has found something after thinking for months something against ex president MR, explained above. I do not whether he was questioned for 8 hours or six hours I didn’t read news yet. Anyhow , it is so sad to see how you treat him within your so called yahapanaya’ I am thinking of the reasons as to why some called your government ‘yama palanaya’ so take care of your name. that too important while doing what ever against family leader or of former or members of former government.
It is good to see that the current government is full of saints and arhats. Lets look forward to hear the results of 21 / 04 / 2015 in parliament.
We can say or write a lot things after the election that is scheduled to be held, already?
Friends, if you wish to write to me, you can write to me through this e mail, email@example.com
Thanks for reading and thanks very much for writing to me, showing world full of friendliness, and sending good wishes in a so much human way