Sunday, October 4, 2015
‘Humans’ that is so ‘inhumane’, right?
do you have anything to say supporting or opposing to following ?
‘Every meatarian is not a butcher’.
I have seen many vehicles go passing me every day, sometimes exhibiting many words, sometimes some advertisements, various things. Amongst them some of the wordings are religious. ‘This is the empire of Buddhism / Lord Buddha’ (fï nqoaO rdcHhs) the relief you seek can be found in Jesus (Tn fidhk iekiSu fcaiqiajykafia <Õ ;sfí) kfuda nqoaOdh! iajia:s isoaOï`
What are those? Are those just words or something that leads your mind to ‘think and act’ according to what such sentences says or expects you to follow?
It is true that the Laws and Courts are introduced by individuals / to groups out side to this country. It is true that Saddam Hussain was hanged till death. It is true that the electric chair is in function to deal with the fate of wrong doers
I am asking the superiors of this land we live, the heads of this country Is it all right to re introduce the death penalty / hang till death as a punishment when we highly speak of human rights.
I know that a very expensive ‘robe’ was purchased from Singapore, to re begin the ‘ ella mereema’ .
I know that one or few graduates were appointed as officers in charge of that locally known as alugosuwa
Often as a prutagjana I too feel that every crime doer should be hanged till death.
Then again I thought such punishments are too soft as a punishment.
The brainies cannot think like the way I think.
The responsible cannot take decisions based on the judgements of the pruthagjana (those who have not attain nibbana due to that reason travels across the sansaara / individuals who has not abolished the kleshas (sins) within themselves) based on their emotional feelings or as any other person thinks, they should think ‘wide and broad’.
The whole world is very fond of protecting the rights of the humane. The very same groups ( or some of them) think that every (?) or some (?) criminal should hanged till death.
Is it a solution – sustainable solution to ‘minimize or eliminate such acts in any society we live?
i do not know what other responsible departments are planning to do with regard to continuing or maintaining 'peace and Harmony of a / the society, to'protect law and order', what is the role of the religious parties and what plans they have in the future, in their minds?, the role and duties of Educationists, lesson writers, curriculum writers?
i do not know whether they cannot think of any thing to 'control', minimize or abolish, prevent such such things happening in a society totally, rather day and night , sleeplessly think of introducing various new punishments for the offenses they can think of?
I am not against maximizing the punishments but I am against ‘ hang till death’ or death penalty
If you think that it should be introduced ‘ I think that it is the end of this human world’
How do you describe a crime? I am not asking the description given in the books?
I believe every human creature is a criminal to some extent. I do not think that we can find a person who has not done a single error or something that spoils others lives.
It depends on how it affects the lives of the near and dear ones, the people you associate, people of the country you very respect, the globe you think that so eager to protect the rights of the human?
I do not know how I should explain this. I very strongly feel that there are some contradictions in what you talk and how you act
For example, you say that every human has a right to live. You never say that it is except the criminals or wrong doers’
If you think that it should be introduced let me provide you a list in addition to the list mentioned or described in the book of law as so called punishments for the inventory offenses
Hang the person who introduced ‘nuclear bombs and weapons’ to this world?
Who ever introduced to slavery into this human world,
The world policy makers that introduced policies to spoil people's lives and to disorder them
The decision makers that take or took wrong decisions to spoil the lives of the people with regard to the subjects they dealt with / deal with; Who ever introduced what ever to imbalance this world ‘economically that supported to increase the gap between each ‘class’ ( between the first class countries and the third 'class' countries according to the wealth indicators they have invented, learned) unequally distributing the resources available in what ever region or within what ever land
It is no point screaming or allying or coalitionning against this and that of this world we live such as wars , crimes especially when you find contradictions , confusions in what they say and what they do’.
You say, do research, you introduce medications to cure some health hazards that people suffer due to ‘smoke’ for example. But at the same time you have given them to chance to produce them and sell them everywhere in this world we live.
Is that because you expect your Drug manufacturing companies to earn big profit, for example to cure cancer there is no permanent drugs or medications introduced yet but there are other treatments and medications very expensive, am I right? And some of the medications I do not know whether it is available locally?
I remember one of the ladies that we know very well, recently suffered from breast cancer and underwent an operation had to purchase a medication / drug from the United States (if I am not mistaken with the country she purchased the drug)
she is not a smoker i took that example to explain what i say thoroughly
the high smokers i doubt not is highly vulnerable to diseases such as 'cancer' and chronic lungs issue, Kidney issues ?
I do not understand any of these?
let me try to take some other examples to justify what i say
We know that America is openly, theoretically, documentarily against nuclear weapons but at the same time they store nuclear weapons ( let me memorize, did I listen to one of President Obama's famous speeches made somewhere out of America) saying they store them to safe guard the world from the people who use the same weapons
I do not understand these, do you?
You know what the Russian President Putin said to famous Charlie during an interview hosted between them, recently?
I am not going to analyze them.
Can you remember what he said about using nuclear weapons and according to what I understand ‘the contradictions between what ‘say and what do’
The Daily News recently quoted the interview with President Putin under the title; ‘Putin: All countries should respect Ukraine’s Sovereignty’
Let me quote few lines that caught my eyes
“Our partners in the United States are not trying to hide the fact that they supported those opposed to President Yanukovich”
“There are no Russian troops in Ukrain”
“The US tactical nuclear weapons are in Europe, let US not forget this”
“Does it mean that the US has Occupied Germany or those who never stopped the occupation after WW II & only transformed the occupation troops into the NATO …….. & if we keep our troops on our territories on the border with dome state, you see it is a crime”?
The US more than any other country, has used its foreign POLICY in its Internal Political Struggle”
(the DN (Daily News) has not underlined or italiced the letters sentences, I did so to highlight the quotes)
Sovereignty is a very beautiful word
I believe that Sovereignty equals to ‘no interferences / unnecessary interventions ‘
You know that I am not a fisherman / fisherwoman but I eat ‘fish’ , those who like to eat meat do not kill the animals or they are not hunters but they, do eat meat’. But I know that as a Buddhist ‘ no point saying ‘panathipaatha weramani sikkapadan samadhiyaami’ ( let’s prevent from taking, stealing ‘the rights of living creatures’/ lets prevent from killing animals) chanting it every morning and evening.
They eat Meat but they let others to kill the animals for their supper or meals. You know when it comes to non butchery things it is very dangerous to follow that theory.
There is a saying in Sinhala I do not know whether I can provide a better translation for that, explains very well what i am trying to say using above example.
‘Ballallu lawa kos eta baawanawa’ . Experts please provide the translation.
America and some world leaders follow that theory. Sometimes they present their policies in a very sainty way but when it comes to practice them, any fools should understand the ‘contradictions’ lies within such talks and acts’.
The problem is not totally their’s. problem is that those who like to please them and doesn’t have a backbone to speak some of the issues apparent, like to stay ‘mute’ or silent, I do not know thinking of what’?
Every country of the world is not a bit but a lot important. But the problem is some country leaders given some country leaders an unnecessary ‘power’ to enjoy and they justify the way they uses their power’. Most importantly forgetting that ‘how it would supports to spoil this world and lead into unnecessary divisions to be cemented.
I am against death penalty, that is all I have to say. I do not know what other citizens have to say about this.
I believe that who ever must think of this not emotionally but intelligently that is very because we live in a world that continues with unending human rights big talks’
Sabba Satta Bhawantu Sukhittata!
May All beings be Happy!