(For all WORRIERS Human and innovators of Robot Technologies)
Robot Technology,
Rocket science is no longer new to this world full of newest innovations, the
seekers of new routes of Innovations. The robot technology, about sometime back took
in charge of not only of some places of work but also of some Modern Domestic Environments
that accepts, acknowledges and value
such kind of technology in their day today lives.
Introducing
‘Robot Worriers’ into the areas of Armies/ Inland Armed Forces is something new
to me and i have not heard about such things using instead of Human Worriers before.
Yet, using advanced Technology is not something new or something that surprises
me. Perhaps, it is true that in the Asian regions, long before the WW1 and WW2
was in process and in the era of its practices, was not using the Tech of Wars as
such by the involved parties, I guess. Yet, I say not that we lack anything
with regard to the intelligence or the Knowledge and it’s the need or the
requirements arising, applicability of the armies of the countries leads into
using such practices.
I do not
like to rank the Armies / Inland security Forces considering its sizes, force,
technology used, Knowledge, resources (Human and Otherwise) etc. sometimes it
is no fair to rank them since each and every country has its own geo, political,
social back grounds , including effects of Histories of the countries.
I like to
think of the ‘Limitations and the Benefits’ of using such technology. Before
moving on to that, keep this in mind ‘Robot is a machine innovated by Humans
considering many things. What are they; I
am sure you have a lists of things?
I cannot
even think of the questions I should ask without really knowing the a b c d ‘s of the tech that the Russia talks
about.
Are these
robots to be controlled by any ‘tech units’ handled by humans, established somewhere
in the same region or outside to the Premises of wars?
What are
the capacities of ‘IDENTIFYING THE ENEMIES’, how to target the target
accurately?
What information
should it carry? What is the tech to be used? How does it get the pictures?
What are
the bottle necks, constraints predictable when using such mechanisms?
What if
the robot faces any technical failures / constraints during a peak of a mission?
Do you
have plans to minimize such issues, practical?
How fast
can it be fixed? Can it be fixed without
reaching the machine?
What is
the metal / iron using that has the ability to face ‘modern tech attacks”
What if
the computerized controlled areas attacked using invisible mechanisms to
destroy the machines and the robot?
Do you have
solutions for that?
Any hidden
robot technology in place?
Is the Size
of the robot easily visible to the other party?
What
technology can be used to destroy such robots, this isn’t something I must ask,
I know. Yet, for the protection of the robots that is planning to be introduced,
to be used in the areas that too is something important to be considered. Am I
right?
Does it
provide any License and should it get any permission from somewhere before
using such technologies? Perhaps, this
is a silly question I am asking. Who owns the patent and the right to
manufacture ‘Robot Worriers’ in the world?
What money
does it cost?
Is the
NATO or the UNHRC is planning to introduce any new set of laws such as ‘Robot
Rights’ other than the existing ‘human rights’ / ‘soldiers rights to safe guard
their Nations and their own Lives from invaders / invasions?
Does the
robot have the right to use any ‘fighting mechanisms / strategies depending on
the situations in the war Zones, in order to protect them while fighting against,
especially because ‘situations in the war zones of any on going process are UNPREDICTABLE’? Though they always carry a plan made with
them, based on the information they have gathered on the groups of invaders /
nature of fighting / strategies / tack ticks used earlier, the situations in
such environments are unpredictable. Am I incorrect?
Seriously I
am thinking of how the UN files cases against the armies, who are facing battles
within battles? I often wonder, whether
the UN is suggesting that ‘no matter what ever happen to the lives of the soldiers,
do only the what we ask you to do / say’?
Often, I wonder
whether it is possible to change the tasks of work just to get an idea before ‘planning
or righting sentences of laws, writing policies, for instances. Do not laugh at me for saying this; I am
wondering whether it is possible for the Commissioner of Human Rights for
example, to be in any battle field before releasing any statements on certain
things related to the subject I write today.
I think
that is the problem we mostly face because some take decisions, write policies
just sitting at an entirely different area / environments to the subject they deals
with. I think some have no clue about what the armies face during a battle.
They take decisions release statements based on the secondary data they gather
from various sources. Sometimes it is a
matter of sources they get information from, rely on?
During all
these unending conversations, what I fear is ‘whether the world will have to unstoppably
innovate, introduce new technologies to face wars and when is the day that we
can use the same tech for the sake of ‘sustainability of peace’ staying away
from battle fields? One can, for sure argue that ‘what we are doing right now
is ‘safe guarding the peace fighting against the enemies of peace or terrorists
(identified or named by the authorities relevant)
What answer
I should give them, I am wondering.
This
is the other news I read, Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces to test-fire new
RS-26 missile in 2nd quarter of 2016. And at the other end the White House have
said that ‘Afghan
forces need more training equipments. (http://www.pajhwok.com/)
Two different
countries with two different armies, with two different mission styles, and
visions and aims inside, doing their work in Syria and in Afghanistan. The UN on
the other side planning Hybrid courts, visiting the countries that they have
not been before during any wars, releasing their statements on the missions
mentioned above and on the missions already achieved and there is peace and no fighting
/ battle to be seen or practiced, without really ‘praising them for stopping the
wars years old.
Who were the partners
of the WW1 and WW2? Who were the allies, coalitions supported I am not trying
to dig out the buried past. All what I am trying to do here is trying to
realize, find answers as to how do you justify wars of those days and the wars
just ended, the wars on going?
Lets burry terrorism
and let the buried be buried and stay in peace without really trying to torture
them from time to time and fearing of what?
Let’s pray for a war
free world, what else can be done?
No comments:
Post a Comment