I am thinking of
the diplomats, I am thinking of various carrier personalities, I am thinking of
various professionals, their awareness on their duties, responsibilities,
rights etc because of socio political situation of the country - current.
People have things
to say these days, about constitutions of various numbers and years. People compare things of past and present.
People compare the situations with incidents. Some challenge some. Some hold or
exchange various things about people’s personal opinions, public opinions of
individual compiled the 19A, about its content, about sub sentences, or sub
lines or people’s rights of holding ‘views – independent’ on various facts or
incidents of here and around globe.
About the 19A;
people hold various opinions or perceptions and they show their views against
or support. You cannot say ‘people have no right to show their personal views
on that or say things of their responses with a negative attitude or face-cut,
mood.
They can show
their views various accepted ways, take small protests for examples. Through
what others say, according to the ways they show their views, strategies used
to say things ‘ you can have an idea of
what others say’, what others believe.
Before releasing
any statement on anything, one should think of his/ her position, what right
they are given by the positions they hold (carrier), ‘for example, if we say ‘somehow
we are going to get the support’, somehow we are going to publish it’.
Sometimes
we have positions that once the job given is over, they have no right to the
work assigned. But like everyone else they have the right to hold their
personal views. You need to careful when you are using terms or words such as ‘we’,
‘us’, their, ours etc. specially when you are acting or talking or representing
an institution, group, party. I am a person that has no affiliation to any institution,
or party I hold my personal views on current or past things here or there, and I
am not representing anyone either.
Today, I heard
that the Former President Mahinda Rajapakse was asked to appear before the
bribery Commission , according to the news ‘that is because of the decision he
was taken before election to appoint ‘ Ex- UNP Party secretary, as ‘ Minister, health affairs, when the ex
health minister, the current President left the government to contest as ‘presidential candidate
The idea of
writing this essay is not to talk about any law points or facts, especially
because I am not a lawyer but a woman who has some knowledge, I believe, about
general things of the society on this and that.
I like to try to use my common sense here, fully.
According to my
personal beliefs, views ‘ I say it is not good to keep any position ‘blank’,
empty or vacant even for a tiny period of time, specially when the vacant position
and its duties considered as highly important for related people, department, nation or country, though the deputies or the
sub monitors can handle some part of the assigned duties of any position
relevant or applicable, important.
I think I
shouldn’t talk much about the decisions taken by ex ministers of ex government to
‘jump and go’ ( ysgmq lKavdhug fydfrka mek,
hkav) and join the other group , planning everything secretly,
without releasing or handing over any
prior notices to the captains, leaders, or the person in charge of party
activities. I do not know how the law has guarded their decision of leaving the
ex government thinking of joining the ‘sworn candidate then, to support his /their
project activities.
According to what
I read or heard’ the set of laws written in order to support the decisions of
any party member who wish to leave their parties, from its membership was
compiled by or the sentences were added during the period of ex chief of
justices (?) Mr. Sarath N Silva. I do not know whether there is any sentences added
to remind the members that they should inform who ever leading or heading the
party of their resignations before or within what so ever period of time.
Though you find no
sentences as such ‘people can use their common senses or ethical values’. i do not like to say same thing again and
again because I have discussed this matter or what ever happened in the past
with regard to political change of the country many times. Yet, I often feel
that it is good to remind or freshen my mind on that or take examples from past
to verify or clarify what I say.
If the commission say,
according to what so ever law that the Former President has broke any mandate
of any thing, they need to think back on certain things happened before the presidential election.
I feel that the
bribery commission should know or aware of the groups, who ever was handling
the ‘project ( all know) activities’ , forget what ever law point you know, but
do not forget how they formed the government – current. How they picked and
chose ‘members to form the government – current. What law or ethics they
followed or respected to do so. How
saintful they are then. How they Bribed the ex ministers of the former
government not quantitatively but mentally ( You can say NO)
How did those ex
ministers who left the party, to join the sworn group? How yahapath (hym;a)
were they?
I feel, if you are
talking about bribes they were the first to do so.
bribing (personally i like to weigh it this way) or keeping ‘ certain positions before
the persons who wish to join the former ‘presidential candidates hunting
Project’ as ‘presidential candidate’, after agreeing to certain things ( I have
not read their agreements- popular or the agreements not published, the
agreements - oral) , for examples such
too I guess were sort of bribing (change the law if its not written).
‘the chance given or shown to who ever wished
to contest as presidential candidate’, I say also was something similar to
bribing. What can you say about such things. I do not know who involved though.
Are these my
arguments looks ‘odd’ or looks like something like a joke’, probably. I do not
about the law, the laws sometimes you can change as you please, if you know the
facts points or to support ‘any nation’, any community, any people of any
country, I as a citizen of this motherland feel that as the President of the
country, then , as the President of the country who was not handling by any
outside or internal thread , the decision taken by President MR , to fill the
vacancy of the ‘ minister of health ’that was vacant, was a good decision,
specially, considering the situation at that time.
Because according
to my personal view, the people of the country became little ‘uncertain, furious’
or little disturbed after the incident happened in the political spheres, The decision
of ex Minister, health affairs to join
the other political party (?), group that was newly formed, without really
informing the ex party leadership about his decision to join the project group.
So to calm and
quite the Nation of the country after such incident, any leader, lawfully or
socially should take action to avoid any socially disturbed situations, any
confusion within the communities. Because people’s waves are stronger or
sometimes unpredictable , if you know bit of political history of past.
I do not know
whether you can say such are called ‘psychological bribing’ ( udkisl w,a,ia)
or something, I do not know the exact term for that? Such things cannot be
easily measured , right?
How is it possible
for the law to catch such? People can analyze such activities that way as well,
right?
I am not against
the President Sirisena, because I respect the VOTE of the People in its fullest
‘respect’ and meaning. I guess at least
the President knew about the decision taken by the Bribery commission to take
The Ex President before the commission. if he says that he doesn’t aware of it,
I as a citizen of this mother land say, its silly and not worth of handling
such a huge position.
Awareness of
something is not equal to ‘interfering’. As a President, independent, no other
external thread of handling his work, duties, when the citizen or any external
member of any group inquire him about what ever reasonable, what ever
activities that people have right to ask, he cannot say’ I am not aware of it’.
Awareness of activities of any tiny weeny dept.or centre of government is
highly essential and that is what people expect from any top leaders.
According to some
idiots they say, example, if any school boy shown any skills or won any
trophies under the leadership of any principle of any school, he can claim his
‘ credits’ dignity via such achievements. Also they say that such people,
individuals are part of winning group or achievers but for a President like MR,
when it comes to other significant activities such as ‘wining a humanitarian war’
in Sri Lanka for example, leading a country’ aiming at eradicating terror fear,
giving all ‘forces liberty, without any interferences to handle ‘battle
activities’ giving necessary guidance, liberty, government support, providing
all relevant , necessary weaponry, equipments, tools and mental support cannot
say that he was a massive part of winning the freedom, the liberty against
terror’. But such idiots categorize such things as something sin’. It is truly
sad to hear that how some, so called educated say things so idiotically.
If you are a
leader, dear sirs and madams , I say ‘you cannot say you are unaware of any
current activities’, or decision taken by any group, that is existing under
your supervision, if you are not aware of activities or decision taken by
relevant or authoritative groups or individual responsible, then it’s a matter
of ‘wrong / inaccurate governing methodologies. Should be corrected immediatly.
Then, I suggest
please change such systems, first and foremost. We wish to have a leader who is
very well aware of every single thing happening around the country, in the
departments, in the ministries, near ministers or dear ministers.
I have seen some
leaders fallen sleep when others in the parliament behave like kids throwing
papers here and there but it is different when the same holding some
responsible position. Remember ?
The leaders should be awaken all time, all moment not fallen sleep. The leaders should be firm and strong.
The vows it self
or wishes of handful or few won’t protect or save your positions, it is the
likes or dislikes of entire or at least majority ( I am not referring this term
to describe any ethnic group), in one word it is the ‘vote’.
According to
current handling, protection given by the law or as described in the book
of
laws or what ever term you use ‘ the president cannot take decision to appoint
any top positions using his executive power, because the president will not be
the executive president any more unless it is written or described in the
constitution.
So next time no
person can come to any position if the majority of people disagree. I do not
know whether I am right here. Do not forget that I am using my common sense
here, not the law points.
So finally, the
current government, the bribery commission has found something after thinking
for months something against ex president MR, explained above. I do not whether
he was questioned for 8 hours or six hours I didn’t read news yet. Anyhow , it
is so sad to see how you treat him within your so called yahapanaya’ I am
thinking of the reasons as to why some called your government ‘yama palanaya’
so take care of your name. that too important while doing what ever against
family leader or of former or members of former government.
It is good to see
that the current government is full of saints and arhats. Lets look forward to
hear the results of 21 / 04 / 2015 in parliament.
We can say or
write a lot things after the election that is scheduled to be held, already?
Friends, if you
wish to write to me, you can write to me through this e mail, lifelinks.work@gmail.com
Thanks for reading
and thanks very much for writing to me, showing world full of friendliness, and sending good wishes in a so much human way
No comments:
Post a Comment